<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">I mean it is possible to compile static Python on Windows, but it will be unable to load extension modules so it's usefulness is arguable.</div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 4 дек. 2014 г., at 16:25, Ilya Kulakov <<a href="mailto:kulakov.ilya@gmail.com" class="">kulakov.ilya@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Phil,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As we discussed previously, it's impossible to properly compile static Python on Windows.</div><div class="">We propose to abandon it (or at least make non-default or advanced feature) in favor of dynamic library.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This patch updates python metadata so that extension modules that are part of the python dynamic library</div><div class="">will be excluded from the resulting binary.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://github.com/GreatFruitAndy/pyqtdeploy/commit/867f4fdcce362913134ebf2cbf63ee789cbccef2.patch" class="">https://github.com/GreatFruitAndy/pyqtdeploy/commit/867f4fdcce362913134ebf2cbf63ee789cbccef2.patch</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>