[Eric] FW: Again about: Eric(5) tools

[Pietro Moras]

Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 12:58:46 -0400From: cjwilliams43 at gmail.comTo: studio-pm at hotmail.comSubject: Re: [Eric] Again about:  Eric(5) tools
  
    
  
  
    On 02/11/2013 12:06 PM, Pietro Moras
      wrote:
    
    
      
      
        >  how basic
          Dear Colin,
           By design cx_Freeze can be used at three levels,
          three different ways:  
          1/3)  At basic “cxfreeze” level (by the way, it's how
          it's currently embedded in Eric);
          2/3)  By means of custom cx-Distutils-like “setup.py”
          scripts;
          3/3)  By means of direct use of cx_Freeze modules library.-
        It was my first choice to investigate the “setup.py”
          script way, and I found it: 
           – Messy 
           – “Unripe”
           – Unsupported
          So that I gave it up. 
          Anyhow I would be happy to change my mind if cx_Freeze people
          gave me sound reasons to; so far they didn't... 
          That said, I'll be also glad to further discuss this topic
          with you, in case you're interested.
          All the best.
           - P.M.
          
           
        
          Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 10:34:34
          -0400
          From: cjwilliams43 at gmail.com
          To: studio-pm at hotmail.com
          Subject: Re: [Eric] Again about: Eric(5) tools
          
          On 02/11/2013 8:26
            AM, Pietro Moras wrote:
          
          
            
            
              I'd welcome your thoughts,
                remarks and proposals about this list of Eric(5) tools
                as currently chosen to be Test & Documented next
                2014, in order of preference: 
               – Mecurial VCS
               – Set of “plugins”
               – “cxfreeze” (basic use of
                cx_Freeze, only)
               – Revision/updating of one of
                the existing Eric Tech.Reports.-
               
                For the final choice I'd welcome your thoughts, remarks
                and proposals. Thank you.
                 - P.M.
                         
            _______________________________________________
Eric mailing list
Eric at riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/eric

          
          I would
            suggest cx_freeze, depending on how basic            
            Colin W.
          
      
    
    Thanks.
      
      Most packages seem to be available in the Windows binary form.  It
      appears that cx_freeze is potentially helpful for other packages.
      
      I don't wish to pursue the matter, thanks.
      
      Colin W.
     		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/pipermail/eric/attachments/20131102/0451bac7/attachment.html>