Response to Studio-PM’s Tech. Reports

[Detlev Offenbach]

Hello Edward,

this is a very valid statement. Unfortunately there haven't been many 
volunteers doing some kind of documentation for eric. As eric ist mostly run 
as a one-man show, I am not in a position to write descent documentation. 
However, maybe somebody on this list will read this post and step in like 
Pietro did years ago with his Technical Reports. Even though some parts are 
outdated, they are still valuable. That is the reason they are still available 
through the eric web site.

Regards,
Detlev

PS: Yes, eric has probably much more to offer than you already discovered. Just 
ask what you are looking for and I will try to point you in the right 
direction.

Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2020, 12:03:46 CEST schrieb Edward Mansfield:
> As an Eric newbie and with the dearth of user documentation for eric I have
> found the Tech Reports extremely useful. I really appreciate the effort
> expended. Eric seems like a really good and powerful IDE with lots of
> useful features. The major problem is lack of documentation. Experimenting
> with all the features to figure out how they work is time consuming and
> very distracting especially when engaged in a ‘real’ development task. As a
> consequence I only use a fraction of the features, which work really well
> as far as they go. I always have the feeling that Eric could be doing a lot
> for me if I only knew how.
> 
> Edward Mansfield

-- 
Detlev Offenbach
detlev at die-offenbachs.de