[PyQt] Re: Crash with shortcircuit signals

[Phil Thompson]

On Tuesday 10 July 2007 5:42 pm, you wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> a little crasher:
>
> ==============================================
> from PyQt4.QtCore import *
>
> app = QCoreApplication([])
> for i in range(300):
>      print i
>      w1 = QObject(None)
>      w2 = QObject(None)
>      print id(w1), id(w2)
>      QObject.connect(w2, SIGNAL("CRASH"), w1, SIGNAL("CRASH"))
>      w2.emit(SIGNAL("CRASH"))
> ==============================================
>
> This snippet segfaults on both Linux and Windows with recent SIP/PyQt
> versions. The segfault is due to an infinite loop, that can be aborted
> before it smashes the stack with this patch:
>
> Index: sip/QtCore/qobject.sip
> ===================================================================
> --- sip/QtCore/qobject.sip (revision 13422)
> +++ sip/QtCore/qobject.sip (working copy)
> @@ -955,9 +955,15 @@
>   // wrapped tuple of Python argument objects.
>   void PyQtProxy::pysignal(const PyQt_PyObject &pyargs)
>   {
> +    static int recursion = 0;
> +
>       void *_a[] = {0, const_cast<void *>(reinterpret_cast<const void
> *>(&pyargs))};
>
> +    recursion += 1;
> +    if (recursion == 5)
> +       abort();
>       QMetaObject::activate(this, &staticMetaObject, 0, _a);
> +    recursion -= 1;
>   }
>
>
> I *think* it's related to an instance's address being reused by Python
> before PyQt has stopped bookkeeping its existence. On my computer, this
> is the output:
>
> 0
> 9193416 9193488
> 1
> 9193560 9193416
> 2
> 9193488 9193560
> [segfault]
>
> As you can see, the instance address is reused by Python, and this
> somewhat triggers the infinite loop in dispatching the signal (the
> signal becomes connected to the same instance emitting it).

Hmm, works for me (even if I up the loop count to 3000).

Can anybody else reproduce it? Are you on a 32 or 64 bit system?

Phil