No subject

portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and 
distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, 
provided that you also meet all of these conditions: "

Anyone want to make me really happy and point out where I'm wrong?

btw, trolltech, I would certainly like to hear the official stance on 
developing GPL applications in Qt in Windows.  It appears that even though 
I've paid a chunk of money so I can develop commercial Windows/Linux 
applications with Qt, I cannot license anything under the GPL if I use 
Python/PyQt in any fashion (because it's crossplatform itself and would be 
expected to run on Windows) and cannot develop *any* Qt application for 
Windows that would be licensed under the GPL.

Does this mean that PyQt previous to the new license Phil implemented was 
violating the Qt license agreement.  Of course, this is a little silly, but 
all the implications are in place...  Has trolltech considered developing 
wrappers for languages other than C++ so we don't have to play these games.  
I suggest you take a look at Smoke, a recent addition to KDE.  Maybe 
something similar could be developed by Trolltech in house.

Greg

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Re: [Issue N6078]  allowed distribution methods
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:04:36 +0200
From: support at trolltech.com
To: Greg Fortune (Fortune Solutions) <greg at gregfortune.com>
Cc: support at trolltech.com

Hi Greg,

<snip>

You are allowed to freely distribute the Qt dll with your application so
that your users can use your application.  As for getting PyQt to work,
I can't help since we don't supply PyQt.

I hope this helps and have a nice day!

Andy
------------------------------------------------
Technical Support Technician                 Fax: +47 21604801
Trolltech AS, Waldemar Thranes gt. 98, N-0175 Oslo, Norway

-------------------------------------------------------