[PyQt] default to list?
Damien Elmes
resolve at ichi2.net
Thu Mar 12 13:58:56 GMT 2009
It's all very well to say it's a client issue, but if the majority of
people are using clients that don't make it easy, then there's an
argument for being more pragmatic.
Anyway, I can work around it in my client, but my client defaults to
personal replies and when I sent an answer to a question earlier today
then realised it had only gone to the original author, I wondered how
many other answers had gone unshared.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Frédéric
<frederic.mantegazza at gbiloba.org> wrote:
>
> Le 12/3/2009, "Arnold Krille" <arnold at arnoldarts.de> a écrit:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>On Thursday 12 March 2009 07:59:10 Damien Elmes wrote:
>>> Currently the list defaults to the original author when replying. What
>>> do you think about changing it to default to replying to the whole
>>> list instead? As it stands, people have to go out of their way to
>>> make their replies and advice public.
>>
>>You mean mangling the reply-to: -header?
>>
>>There is always great discussions on all the mailinglists where this is
>>changed (either from or to mangling...)
>>The objective results of these discussions I know so far:
>>1) Mangling the reply-to: -header is not rfc conformant.
>>2) Getting good mail-client helps because it recognizes the mailinglist-
>>headers and automaticly replies to the list.
>>At least kmail here does, I didn't have to fuzz with the receivers address to
>>answer in public...
>>
>>But whether or not this is changed, some people will always complain and some
>>people will always answer to private when they should have answered in public.
>
> I agree; this is not simple. I also prefer a reply to the list, but most
> people don't.
>
> People often use 'Reply to all', so the message goes to the ML *and* to
> the sender. But in this case, I only receive the message without header
> (the private copy), so it is not filtered and automatically put it my
> PyQt folder.
>
> I think that the robot is configured to only send one copy in such case,
> which is a good thing, but is there a way to configure it so I receive
> the message to the list, and not the private one?
>
> PyQT is not the only list in this case; I think this is a mailman issue...
>
>
> --
> Frédéric
>
> _______________________________________________
> PyQt mailing list PyQt at riverbankcomputing.com
> http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
>
More information about the PyQt
mailing list