[PyQt] ANN: dip v0.1 Released - An Application Development Framework for PyQt and Python v3
Phil Thompson
phil at riverbankcomputing.com
Tue Jul 20 13:43:23 BST 2010
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:55:51 -0400, Lic. José M. Rodriguez Bacallao
<jmrbcu at gmail.com> wrote:
> and when do you plan to support python 2.6.x?
I don't promise to support it at all - originally dip was intended to be
Python v3 only.
However my experiments are going well. I hope to either release a version
for Python v2.6/2.7 in the next couple of weeks - or say that they won't be
supported at all.
Phil
> On 7/17/10, Phil Thompson <phil at riverbankcomputing.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:09:04 +0200, Antonio Valentino
>> <antonio.valentino at tiscali.it> wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> Il giorno Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:02:57 +0100
>>> Phil Thompson <phil at riverbankcomputing.com> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> dip v0.1 has been released. This is the first release of dip, an
>>>> application development framework for PyQt and (for the moment at
>>>> least) Python v3.
>>>>
>>>> The user documentation, including tutorials and a full API reference
>>>> is available at
>>>> http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/static/Docs/dip/index.html
>>>>
>>>> dip is suitable for developing simple utilities and large scale,
>>>> complex applications. It includes the following features...
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> first of all congratulations for the great job.
>>>
>>> I have still not finished to read the docs but it seems to me that
many
>>> of the features provided by dip are also present in the enthought
>>> framework (Traits, Envisage, etc.).
>>
>> Agreed. I've worked with Enthought for several years and did the
original
>> port to PyQt amongst other things. There is a lot of good stuff in it.
>>
>>> I would like to ask you why you decided to develop a new framework and
>>> which are advantages/drawbacks of using dip instead of enthought.
>>
>> There were many reasons to create a new framework, one being the need
for
>> Python v3 support and the desire to use Python v3 features.
>>
>> Another significant reason was the way that the Enthought stuff
>> implements
>> toolkit independence, ie. the compromises it makes in order to support
wx
>> and PyQt. As a PyQt programmer you often end up being frustrated that
you
>> can't get your GUIs to do what you want because TraitsUi is getting in
>> the
>> way.
>>
>> In dip, QWidgets are first class objects. When you create a GUI you get
a
>> QWidget, not something that wraps a QWidget in an API that is designed
to
>> support wx. Another example (which you'll understand if you are
familiar
>> with Traits) is that dip allows you to do...
>>
>> class MyClass(QObject, Model):
>> ...
>>
>> ...where Model is the dip equivalent of HasTraits.
>>
>> Of course the Enthought stuff is very mature and has lots of stuff that
>> dip doesn't have - for example it is very good for engineering
>> applications
>> that need 2D and 3D visualisation.
>>
>> Phil
>> _______________________________________________
>> PyQt mailing list PyQt at riverbankcomputing.com
>> http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
>>
More information about the PyQt
mailing list