[PyQt] swig vs sip

[Jan Haag]

On 10/2/10 5:44 PM, Mohammed Rashad wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> I am newbie to sip and swig. I want to make python bindings for the C++ GUI library FOX.
> Which is the best option swig or sip?
> please explain you view on the question.

You may find the views on this list somewhat biased in favor of sip...
However, swig strives for simplicity, particularly for small foreign
function libs, while sip gives you much more control over the generated
bindings (witness PyQt api v. 2; v. 1 is more like what you may expect
in swig and I'm not sure even this would work). As I know little about
FOX, I can't tell you more than that.

Jan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x1665A74C.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3174 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/pipermail/pyqt/attachments/20101004/850d6e0e/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 905 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/pipermail/pyqt/attachments/20101004/850d6e0e/attachment.pgp>