License of PyQt-builder (BSD) vs pyqt-bundle (SIP/GPL)
Phil Thompson
phil at riverbankcomputing.com
Sun Nov 22 11:29:54 GMT 2020
On 09/11/2020 11:31, Ben Greiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently in the process of migrating the PyQt5 rpm packages for
> openSUSE Tumbleweed from SIP4 to SIP5. This requires a new package for
> PyQT-builder.
>
> The website of pyqt-builder as well as the setup.py specify BSD
> license.
> Most of the source files contain the appropriate BSD 2-clause license
> header. However, some files in pyqtbuild/bundle have the SIP-GPL hybrid
> license header.
>
> Is this intentional? Is pyqt-builder BSD licensed but pyqt-bundle is
> SIP/GPL?
It makes sense for PyQt-builder to use the same SIP license.
Thanks,
Phil
More information about the PyQt
mailing list