[PyQt] FW: To Eric(5) IDE Users

[Pietro Moras]

Hi Pietro,   I prefer second method "custom Distutils-like “setup.py” scripts" to build my executablesOn Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Pietro Moras <studio-pm at hotmail.com> wrote:



Hi Black,   I wander if, of the three ways for using cx_Freeze, you consider “cxfreeze” adequate to your needs. Indeed, by design, cx_Freeze can be used at three levels, three different ways:  
1/3)  At basic “cxfreeze” level (by the way, it's how it's currently embedded into Eric);2/3)  By means of custom Distutils-like “setup.py” scripts;3/3)  By means of direct use of cx_Freeze module library.-
I'd welcome your opinion. Thanks. - P.M. Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 10:33:52 +0200
Subject: Re: [PyQt] To Eric(5) IDE UsersFrom: bl3a3ck at gmail.comTo: studio-pm at hotmail.comCC: pyqt at riverbankcomputing.com

Hicxfreeze is good choice supporting last PyQt5 or 

package standalone installation for Windows and Linux with cxfreeze so i don't have to install PyQt4 to use Eric IDE

Cheers,BLACK
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Pietro Moras <studio-pm at hotmail.com> wrote:



I'd welcome your thoughts, remarks and proposals
about this list of Eric(5) tools as currently chosen to be Test &
Documented next 2014, in order of preference:  

 – Mecurial VCS
 – Set of “plugins”
 – “cxfreeze” (basic use of cx_Freeze, only)
 – Revision/updating of one of the existing Eric
Tech.Reports.
For the final choice I'd welcome your thoughts,
remarks and proposals. Thank you. - P.M. 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/pipermail/pyqt/attachments/20131106/2d843115/attachment.html>