pyqtdeploy: Correct entry point naming?

[Patrick Stinson]

This does not appear to be fixed. I used the scan button and it replaced my top-level package name with the absolute path prefixed with :/

> On Oct 11, 2020, at 10:36 AM, Patrick Stinson <patrickkidd at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I suppose I could finally have a look at a snapshot. I’ve been sticking to stable since my project is in release.
> 
>> On Oct 11, 2020, at 7:47 AM, Phil Thompson <phil at riverbankcomputing.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I think this (and other issues) are fixed in tonight's snapshot. However I'd like confirmation before releasing v3.1.1.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Phil
>> 
>> 
>> On 04/10/2020 19:36, Patrick Stinson wrote:
>>> It appears as though it requires the name of the top level package -
>>> the name of the project folder, not the app package - to be set as the
>>> Name and not the full directory path. But when I click “Scan” it
>>> replaces that Single name with the absolute path of the project
>>> folder. The worker that I am currently using is to edit the project
>>> TOML file after clicking the scan button.
>>> Perhaps it is a bug in the gooey that replaces the top level packet
>>> dish name with that absolute path.
>>>> On Oct 4, 2020, at 6:18 AM, Phil Thompson <phil at riverbankcomputing.com> wrote:
>>>> On 30/09/2020 21:03, Patrick Stinson wrote:
>>>>> What is the correct way to structure an entry point in pyqtdeploy 3?
>>>>> This is not documented.
>>>>> In v2 my entry point for the source tree in the screenshot was
>>>>> familydiagram.pkdiagram.app:main. In pyqtdeploy 3 that entry point
>>>>> string gives the following error:
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 953, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 219, in _call_with_frames_removed
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 953, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 219, in _call_with_frames_removed
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 965, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'familydiagram'
>>>>> Or the following error if I change it to pkdiagram.app:main:
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>> File "main_app.py", line 1, in <module>
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 965, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named ‘pkdiagram'
>>>>> If use a main script file containing “import pkdiagram.app;
>>>>> pkdiagram.app.main()” instead of an entry point I get the following
>>>>> error:
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>> File "main_app.py", line 1, in <module>
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 965, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named ‘pkdiagram'
>>>>> What is the right way to do this?
>>>> The handling of entry points in v3 hasn't (knowingly) changed.
>>>> Phil
>