pyqtdeploy: Correct entry point naming?

[Phil Thompson]

On 11/10/2020 19:39, Patrick Stinson wrote:
> This does not appear to be fixed. I used the scan button and it
> replaced my top-level package name with the absolute path prefixed
> with :/

That is correct if the location of the package is in a different part of 
the filesystem to the .pdt file.

I assume you tried with a repository copy as tonight's snapshot hasn't 
been created yet.

Phil


>> On Oct 11, 2020, at 10:36 AM, Patrick Stinson <patrickkidd at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I suppose I could finally have a look at a snapshot. I’ve been 
>> sticking to stable since my project is in release.
>> 
>>> On Oct 11, 2020, at 7:47 AM, Phil Thompson 
>>> <phil at riverbankcomputing.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think this (and other issues) are fixed in tonight's snapshot. 
>>> However I'd like confirmation before releasing v3.1.1.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Phil
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 04/10/2020 19:36, Patrick Stinson wrote:
>>>> It appears as though it requires the name of the top level package -
>>>> the name of the project folder, not the app package - to be set as 
>>>> the
>>>> Name and not the full directory path. But when I click “Scan” it
>>>> replaces that Single name with the absolute path of the project
>>>> folder. The worker that I am currently using is to edit the project
>>>> TOML file after clicking the scan button.
>>>> Perhaps it is a bug in the gooey that replaces the top level packet
>>>> dish name with that absolute path.
>>>>> On Oct 4, 2020, at 6:18 AM, Phil Thompson 
>>>>> <phil at riverbankcomputing.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 30/09/2020 21:03, Patrick Stinson wrote:
>>>>>> What is the correct way to structure an entry point in pyqtdeploy 
>>>>>> 3?
>>>>>> This is not documented.
>>>>>> In v2 my entry point for the source tree in the screenshot was
>>>>>> familydiagram.pkdiagram.app:main. In pyqtdeploy 3 that entry point
>>>>>> string gives the following error:
>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 953, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 219, in _call_with_frames_removed
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 953, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 219, in _call_with_frames_removed
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 965, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'familydiagram'
>>>>>> Or the following error if I change it to pkdiagram.app:main:
>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>> File "main_app.py", line 1, in <module>
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 965, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named ‘pkdiagram'
>>>>>> If use a main script file containing “import pkdiagram.app;
>>>>>> pkdiagram.app.main()” instead of an entry point I get the 
>>>>>> following
>>>>>> error:
>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>> File "main_app.py", line 1, in <module>
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 983, in _find_and_load
>>>>>> File "bootstrap-3.7.0.py", line 965, in _find_and_load_unlocked
>>>>>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named ‘pkdiagram'
>>>>>> What is the right way to do this?
>>>>> The handling of entry points in v3 hasn't (knowingly) changed.
>>>>> Phil
>>